⚠️ Affiliate Disclosure: This post contains affiliate links. We may earn a commission if you make a purchase through these links, at no additional cost to you. This helps support our UAP research and sky watching content. Read our full disclosure policy.
The Privacy Dilemma of Serious UAP Investigation
UAP research occupies an uncomfortable space between legitimate scientific inquiry and social stigma. While government disclosure has legitimized the field somewhat (Pentagon’s UAP Task Force, Congressional hearings), serious researchers still face:
– Professional ridicule (“You believe in UFOs?”)
– Career damage (colleagues questioning credibility)
– Unwanted attention from conspiracy communities
– Government monitoring of hotspot visitors
– Harassment from debunker networks
After experiencing several privacy violations during field investigations—including identifying my research site via IP geolocation and subsequent property owner harassment—I realized that digital operational security wasn’t paranoia, it was professional necessity.
That’s when I implemented Surfshark VPN across all research operations. It transformed how I conduct investigations while protecting both my privacy and my witness networks.
Real Privacy Threats UAP Researchers Face
Government Surveillance of UAP Hotspots
Several documented UAP hotspots are near sensitive government facilities:
– Nevada (Groom Lake/Area 51 periphery)
– Utah’s Uintah Basin (near Dugway Proving Ground)
– Pennsylvania military routes
– Virginia restricted airspace zones
Visitors to these areas may be subject to:
– License plate photography
– Cellular device tracking (IMSI catchers)
– Internet traffic monitoring
– Investigation by security personnel
While observation from public land is legal, government agencies monitor who’s watching their facilities. Using unprotected internet at these locations creates digital fingerprints:
– Your IP address reveals your identity
– DNS queries show what you’re researching
– Unencrypted communications can be intercepted
– Your geographic location is logged
I personally experienced this at a Nevada observation site. After two visits using unprotected hotel WiFi for research, I received an email at my professional address asking about my “interest in restricted military facilities.” The only way they connected my physical presence to my professional identity was through digital surveillance.
Doxxing and Harassment from Debunker Communities
UAP research has attracted aggressive debunker communities that actively harass researchers:
– Publicly identifying researchers to discredit them
– Contacting employers to damage careers
– Publishing home addresses and personal information
– Organizing harassment campaigns
These groups monitor UAP forums, research platforms, and social media. Unprotected internet access allows them to:
– Link anonymous research accounts to real identities
– Geolocate research sites via IP addresses
– Identify witness networks
– Track researcher movements and patterns
A colleague had their real identity linked to their anonymous research account through IP correlation. Within days, debunkers contacted their employer claiming they were “mentally unstable” for UAP research. They nearly lost their job.
Witness Protection and Anonymity
Credible UAP research depends on witness testimony. Many witnesses:
– Fear ridicule if identified publicly
– Work in sensitive positions (military, aviation, government)
– Risk careers if associated with UAP phenomena
– Have family/social pressure against speaking out
When witnesses contact researchers via email, forums, or messaging platforms, their IP addresses are logged. Without VPN protection:
– Witness locations can be identified
– Their communications can be monitored
– Their identities can be correlated
– Their privacy is compromised
Several witnesses have explicitly told me: “I’ll share this information if you can guarantee my identity won’t be exposed.” Without strong operational security including VPN usage, I cannot make that guarantee.
Property Owner Identification and Harassment
Many prime observation sites require permission from private property owners. These owners often:
– Prefer privacy (don’t want public attention)
– Have experienced phenomena but don’t want publicity
– Grant access conditionally (anonymity required)
If investigators use unprotected internet to communicate about locations or post data with geographic metadata:
– Property locations can be identified
– Owners can be identified through property records
– They can be harassed by curiosity-seekers or debunkers
– Permission is revoked (you lose investigation access)
I lost access to an excellent Utah observation site because another researcher posted photos with GPS metadata still embedded. The property was identified, the owner was harassed by UFO enthusiasts showing up uninvited, and he revoked all research access.
How Surfshark VPN Protects UAP Research Operations
Surfshark VPN creates an encrypted tunnel for all internet traffic, masking your IP address and encrypting your communications. Here’s how this specifically protects UAP researchers:
IP Address Masking
Without VPN:
– Your real IP address is visible to every website/service
– IP address reveals your geographic location (city-level accuracy)
– IP can be correlated to your identity through ISP records
With Surfshark:
– Your real IP is hidden
– Websites see Surfshark’s server IP instead
– Your actual location is masked
– Multiple researchers appear to come from same IP (additional anonymity)
During field investigations, I connect to Surfshark servers in different states or countries. My actual Nevada observation site appears to access the internet from New York or London—completely masking my real location.
Traffic Encryption
Without VPN:
– Internet traffic can be intercepted (especially on public WiFi)
– Government agencies can monitor communications
– ISPs log your browsing history
– Data is vulnerable to surveillance
With Surfshark:
– All traffic is encrypted (AES-256 military-grade)
– Intercepted data is useless (cannot be decrypted)
– ISPs only see “connected to VPN” (not what you’re doing)
– Surveillance operations cannot read your communications
When communicating with witnesses, uploading sensitive observation data, or coordinating with research networks, this encryption ensures confidentiality.
Anonymous Research Account Protection
Many researchers maintain separation between professional identity and UAP research:
– Anonymous accounts on UAP forums/platforms
– Separate email addresses for research
– Pseudonyms for publishing findings
Without VPN, these can be correlated:
– Login IP addresses link accounts to real identity
– Patterns reveal when “anonymous researcher” is actually you
– Location data connects online activity to physical presence
With Surfshark:
– All accounts accessed through VPN show different IPs
– No correlation between anonymous research and real identity
– Location masking prevents geographic correlation
– Professional reputation protected
I access all UAP research platforms exclusively through Surfshark. My anonymous research identity has never been connected to my professional identity because there’s no IP correlation available.
Multi-Device Protection
Surfshark allows unlimited simultaneous connections. During field research, I run VPN protection on:
– Laptop (data analysis, communications)
– Phone (witness calls, coordination)
– Tablet (field notes, documentation)
– Trail camera cellular systems (data uploads)
All devices protected under single subscription means comprehensive operational security across entire investigation infrastructure.
Practical UAP Research Use Cases
Protecting Witness Communications
When witnesses contact me with sensitive information:
Without VPN exposure risks:
– Witness IP address logged in email headers
– Their location identifiable
– Communications potentially monitored
– Their identity at risk
With Surfshark protection:
– Encrypted communication channel
– IP addresses masked
– Location privacy maintained
– Confidential information exchange protected
I explicitly tell witnesses: “All our communications are conducted through encrypted VPN channels. Your identity and location are protected.”
This assurance has convinced several military and aviation witnesses to share information they otherwise wouldn’t risk disclosing.
Secure Data Uploads from Sensitive Locations
When uploading observation data from hotspot locations:
Without VPN risks:
– Cloud services log your IP and location
– Geographic metadata reveals observation sites
– Upload patterns create digital fingerprint
– Location privacy compromised
With Surfshark benefits:
– Location masked (appears to upload from VPN server location)
– Geographic data obfuscated
– Observation site privacy maintained
– Property owners protected
After Nevada observation sessions, I upload all data through Surfshark. Cloud storage shows uploads coming from Los Angeles or Seattle—not the actual observation site coordinates.
Anonymous Research Account Management
Maintaining professional reputation while conducting serious research:
Professional identity:
– Real name, credentials, employer
– Subject to professional scrutiny
– Career implications if associated with “UFO research”
Anonymous research identity (via Surfshark):
– Pseudonym on UAP platforms
– No connection to professional identity
– Freedom to investigate without career risk
– Protected from harassment
Many credible researchers operate this way—using VPN protection to maintain operational separation between professional life and research activities.
Accessing Region-Restricted Research Resources
Some UAP research resources are region-restricted:
– Government databases with geographic limitations
– Flight tracking platforms with access restrictions
– Academic papers behind institutional access
– International research collaborations
Surfshark allows connecting through servers in 100+ countries, enabling access to region-specific resources needed for comprehensive investigation.
Technical Implementation for Field Research
Initial Setup
Surfshark installation is straightforward:
– Apps for Windows, Mac, Linux, iOS, Android
– 5-minute installation process
– Automatic configuration (no technical expertise required)
– One-click connection
I installed it on all devices before my first protected field investigation. Total setup time: 20 minutes for 4 devices.
Server Selection Strategy
Surfshark operates 3,200+ servers in 100+ countries. Strategic selection depends on use case:
Maximum privacy (field investigations):
– Connect to servers in different states/countries than actual location
– Rotate servers periodically (change digital fingerprint)
– Use countries with strong privacy laws (Switzerland, Iceland, Netherlands)
Performance optimization (large uploads):
– Connect to geographically closer servers (lower latency)
– Use servers with lower user loads
– Surfshark app shows server loads for optimal selection
During field research, I prioritize privacy over minor speed differences—connecting to distant servers for maximum location masking.
Kill Switch Configuration
Surfshark’s kill switch ensures protection even if VPN connection drops:
– Automatically blocks internet if VPN disconnects
– Prevents accidental exposure of real IP
– Critical for sustained protection during multi-hour operations
I enabled kill switch after experiencing VPN disconnection during a sensitive witness video call. The call automatically terminated rather than continuing unprotected—exactly the fail-safe behavior needed.
Split Tunneling for Equipment
Some equipment requires local network access while maintaining VPN protection for internet traffic. Surf shark’s split tunneling allows:
– VPN protection for sensitive traffic (communications, uploads)
– Local access for equipment (cameras, sensors)
– Optimized bandwidth allocation
I use split tunneling to keep VPN active on communications/uploads while allowing trail cameras local network access for configuration.
Mobile App for Field Operations
Surfshark mobile apps provide full protection on phones/tablets:
– Background VPN (always-on protection)
– Auto-connect (protection starts automatically)
– GPS spoofing (location privacy for apps)
– Ad blocking (bonus feature reducing bandwidth usage)
During field investigations, my phone maintains constant VPN connection. All witness calls, research communications, and data access are protected automatically.
Performance Considerations
Speed Impact
VPN encryption adds processing overhead. Typical speed impact:
– Download speeds: 10-20% reduction
– Upload speeds: 10-15% reduction
– Latency: +10-40ms depending on server distance
In practice, this rarely matters for research applications:
– Cloud uploads (3 MB/s vs 3.5 MB/s is negligible)
– Video calls (still plenty of bandwidth)
– Web browsing (no noticeable difference)
For bandwidth-intensive tasks (uploading 50 GB of observation data), the security benefits far outweigh minor speed reductions.
Battery Impact on Mobile Devices
Constant VPN connection increases mobile battery drain by approximately 5-10%. Mitigation strategies:
– Use portable battery banks during field operations
– Disable VPN for non-sensitive tasks (if appropriate)
– Optimize background app activity
During multi-day investigations, I carry 20,000 mAh battery banks—the minor VPN battery impact is negligible compared to total power budget.
Data Usage
VPN encryption adds 5-15% overhead to data usage (slightly larger packet sizes). For unlimited data plans, this is irrelevant. For capped plans, it’s worth noting:
– 50 GB usage becomes ~53-58 GB with VPN overhead
– Account for this in data planning
Since I use unlimited HomeFi for field research, VPN overhead doesn’t impact operations.
Comparing Surfshark to VPN Alternatives
vs. Free VPNs
Free VPNs (ProtonVPN free tier, TunnelBear, etc.):
– Data caps (500 MB – 10 GB/month)
– Limited server access
– Slow speeds
– Questionable privacy policies (often monetize your data)
– No support
Surfshark:
– Unlimited data
– 3,200+ servers in 100+ countries
– Fast speeds (WireGuard protocol)
– Strict no-logs policy (independently audited)
– 24/7 support
Free VPNs are useless for serious research applications. Data caps alone disqualify them (you’ll burn through monthly allotment in hours).
vs. Premium Competitors (NordVPN, ExpressVPN)
NordVPN:
– Excellent service ($12-13/month)
– 6 simultaneous connections
– 5,500+ servers
ExpressVPN:
– Premium service ($13-15/month)
– 5 simultaneous connections
– 3,000+ servers
Surfshark:
– Competitive service ($12-15/month, often discounted to $2-4/month on sales)
– **Unlimited** simultaneous connections (huge advantage)
– 3,200+ servers
For researchers with multiple devices (laptop, phone, tablet, equipment systems), Surfshark’s unlimited connections provide significantly better value. Protect all devices for single subscription cost.
vs. Self-Hosted VPN
Some technical researchers consider self-hosting VPN servers:
Self-hosted advantages:
– Complete control
– No third-party trust required
– Can run on personal infrastructure
Self-hosted disadvantages:
– Requires technical expertise
– Your server IP is still traceable to you
– No jurisdiction privacy benefits
– Infrastructure costs and maintenance
– Single server (no geographic flexibility)
Surfshark provides better operational security because their servers are shared by thousands of users—you blend into crowd anonymity. Self-hosted VPN still leads back to you.
Cost-Benefit Analysis for UAP Researchers
Surfshark Pricing
Regular pricing: $12.95/month (month-to-month)
1-year plan: $3.99/month ($47.88/year)
2-year plan: Often $2.49/month (~$60 for 2 years)
Sales regularly offer 24-month plans at $60-70 total cost.
Value Proposition
Annual cost: $48-155 depending on plan
What you’re protecting:
– Professional reputation (career value: $50,000-100,000+/year)
– Witness identities (irreplaceable relationships)
– Investigation sites (losing access ends research)
– Years of credibility building
– Personal safety from harassment
Spending $48-155 annually to protect $50,000+ in career value plus irreplaceable witness relationships and investigation access is obvious risk management.
Comparison to Security Alternatives
What would alternative security cost?
Separate anonymous internet service for research:
– Dedicated internet line (anonymous billing): $50-80/month = $600-960/year
– Still doesn’t provide location masking or encryption
Burner phones for witness communication:
– Phone + monthly service: $30-50/month = $360-600/year
– Limited protection (still traceable through various means)
Professional security consultant for OpSec:
– Initial assessment: $500-1,500
– Ongoing consulting: $100-300/hour
Surfshark at $48-155/year provides more comprehensive protection than alternatives costing 4-10x more.
Real-World Impact on Research Operations
Enabled High-Profile Witness Testimonies
After implementing VPN protection, I’ve secured testimony from:
– Former military personnel (observations near restricted facilities)
– Commercial pilots (in-flight phenomena)
– Government contractors (sensor data access)
All explicitly cited privacy concerns before speaking. Demonstrating robust operational security (including VPN usage) convinced them to share information.
These testimonies have been critical to understanding patterns in specific hotspot regions.
Prevented Investigation Site Exposure
One property owner grants me access to prime Utah observation location on condition: “No one can know this property hosts UAP research.”
By using VPN protection for all communications and uploads from the site, I’ve maintained this confidentiality for 3 years. The location has never been identified, the owner hasn’t been contacted, and I maintain exclusive research access.
Without VPN protection, uploading 200+ GB of observation data from that location would create digital fingerprints leading directly to the property.
Protected Professional Reputation
I’ve published several UAP research findings under pseudonym through protected anonymous accounts. These have received positive attention from serious researchers and scientists.
My professional identity has never been connected to this research—allowing me to maintain career credibility while contributing to UAP investigation science.
VPN protection is the technical infrastructure enabling this operational separation.
Additional Privacy Measures Beyond VPN
VPN is critical but should be part of comprehensive operational security:
Encrypted Communications
– Use Signal or Telegram for witness messaging (end-to-end encryption)
– PGP/GPG email encryption for sensitive data
– VPN adds another protection layer on top
Metadata Scrubbing
– Remove GPS data from photos before sharing (ExifTool, Photo EXIF Editor)
– Strip identifying information from documents
– VPN prevents location exposure during upload
Anonymous Account Hygiene
– Never access anonymous research accounts without VPN
– Use separate email addresses (anonymous registration)
– Avoid cross-posting content between professional and anonymous identities
– VPN ensures IP separation between identities
Secure Cloud Storage
– Use end-to-end encrypted services (ProtonDrive, Tresorit)
– Two-factor authentication
– VPN protection during access
– Combined encryption at rest (cloud service) and in transit (VPN)
Common Concerns and Misconceptions
“I’m Not Doing Anything Illegal, Why Hide?”
Privacy isn’t about illegality—it’s about:
– Protecting witnesses who fear retaliation
– Maintaining professional reputation
– Preventing harassment from hostile groups
– Controlling who has access to your data
Legal activity still warrants privacy protection, especially in socially stigmatized fields.
“VPNs Are for Criminals”
VPNs are standard security tools used by:
– Journalists protecting sources
– Businesses protecting trade secrets
– Travelers using public WiFi
– Privacy-conscious individuals
Major corporations mandate VPN usage for remote workers. It’s cybersecurity best practice.
“Government Can Break VPN Encryption”
Military-grade AES-256 encryption (Surfshark’s standard) is effectively unbreakable with current technology. While nation-state actors have sophisticated capabilities, they’re not targeting individual UAP researchers.
VPN protection is sufficient for the realistic threat model (debunkers, opportunistic surveillance, privacy violations—not NSA targeted operations).
“VPNs Slow Everything Down”
Modern VPNs using WireGuard protocol (Surfshark included) have minimal speed impact:
– 10-20% reduction in most cases
– Often unnoticeable for typical use
– Upload speeds (critical for research) minimally affected
For 3-4 hour observation data uploads, the difference between 3.0 MB/s and 2.7 MB/s is minutes—negligible compared to security benefits.
The Bottom Line for UAP Field Researchers
UAP investigation exists in a complex environment:
– Government interest in hotspot visitors
– Social stigma threatening professional reputations
– Aggressive debunker communities targeting researchers
– Witnesses requiring privacy protection
– Property owners demanding anonymity
Digital operational security isn’t paranoia—it’s professional necessity.
Surfshark VPN provides critical protection for serious researchers:
Key Security Benefits:
– IP address masking (location privacy)
– Military-grade encryption (communication security)
– Unlimited device connections (comprehensive protection)
– Anonymous account separation (professional reputation protection)
– Witness identity protection (confidential sources)
Cost Efficiency:
– $48-155 annually (often $60 for 2-year plan on sale)
– Protects $50,000+ career value
– Enables witness testimony worth more than equipment costs
– Maintains investigation site access (irreplaceable)
Operational Impact:
– Convinced high-profile witnesses to share testimony
– Protected investigation site locations for 3+ years
– Maintained professional/research identity separation
– Prevented harassment and doxxing attempts
For researchers already investing $8,000-15,000 in observation equipment and $2,000-5,000 annually in travel, spending $48-155/year on operational security is trivial insurance.
The real value isn’t just privacy protection—it’s operational capability. Witnesses who wouldn’t talk without security guarantees. Property owners who won’t grant access without anonymity assurances. Professional credibility maintained while publishing research.
VPN protection transforms these from “impossible” to “standard procedure.”
You can conduct world-class UAP field research with $20,000 in equipment, but if you can’t protect witness identities, maintain investigation site access, and separate research from professional reputation, that equipment generates zero results.
Surfshark at $2-13/month is the cheapest and most impactful investment in research infrastructure you can make—because it enables everything else to function.
In a field where professional ridicule, government monitoring, and aggressive harassment are real threats, comprehensive privacy protection isn’t optional—it’s the foundation of sustainable, credible, long-term investigation work.
